Full-Body vs. Split Workouts — What Actually Works for Busy Adults

Introduction

You don’t need to spend six days in the gym to get stronger. Forget the classic push, pull, legs split. Most adults just need a plan that actually fits real life, not one that takes it over. The truth? Full-body training two or three times a week can build just as much strength and muscle as complicated body-part splits without the burnout or constant soreness.

The Problem (and why people get stuck)

1) Trying to copy athlete/influencer splits. Those plans often assume elite recovery or unlimited time which most people don’t have the luxury of.

2) The “all or nothing” trap. You skip training because it’s leg day and you’re sore or short on time… then miss the week entirely.

3) Chasing soreness over progression. Delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS) feels validating, but soreness ≠ better results (Wilke & Behringer, 2021).

What the Evidence Says 

1) Volume drives growth; the split is just packaging.
When weekly set volume is matched, muscle growth is similar regardless of whether those sets come from full-body or split routines (Schoenfeld et al., 2021; Baz-Valle et al., 2022). That means you can organize your week around your life and still make gains (Schoenfeld et al., 2021; Baz-Valle et al., 2022). 

2) Frequency helps
Meta-analyses show equal-volume programs performed over 2+ sessions per muscle per week are at least as good (and often slightly better) than hitting a muscle once per week (Schoenfeld et al., 2019; Grgic et al., 2018; Hamarsland et al., 2022). For busy adults, this favors 2–3 full-body days over a once-a-week body-part blitz (Schoenfeld et al., 2019; Hamarsland et al., 2022).

3) Full-body may support fat loss, too.
In trained men, full-body training reduced whole-body and regional fat more than a split routine over 8 weeks, with similar strength/muscle outcomes (Carneiro et al., 2024). If body comp is a goal, full-body is a smart default (Carneiro et al., 2024). 

4) Soreness is not a progress report.
DOMS doesn’t necessarily mean more muscle growth. Soreness usually occurs when your body isn’t used to a specific stressor. You can build muscle without feeling wrecked the next day (Wilke & Behringer, 2021). 

5) Untrained and trained lifters see similar patterns.
Studies comparing volume-equated full-body vs. body part splits show similar strength and hypertrophy, so pick the structure that keeps you consistent (Evangelista et al., 2021). 

Actionable Programming (busy-adult friendly)

A. Here is an example of a 3 day program with 45–60 min workouts

• Full-Body A (Mon): Push (press), Pull (row), Lower (squat), Core, Finisher (metabolic conditioning).
  

• Full-Body B (Wed): Push (incline/overhead), Pull (pulldown), Lower (hip extension and hinge), Core, Finisher (metabolic conditioning).
  

• Full-Body C (Fri or Sat): Push (single arm), Pull (single arm), Lower (single leg), Core, Finisher (metabolic conditioning).
   

Keep 6–10 hard sets per large muscle/week across sessions. If you care about a focus area (e.g., glutes), add 2–4 extra sets spread across A/B/C (Baz-Valle et al., 2022).

B. Open-gym add-ons (10–30 min)

• Technique/light volume on sore areas; or
  

• Easy cardio/walking to boost recovery and weekly energy burn; or
  

• Extra sets for a priority muscle (quality > fatigue).
  

C. When a body part split makes sense

• You love training 5–6 days/week.
  

• You’re peaking for physique goals and enjoy more exercise variety.
  

• You want shorter 25–35-minute sessions most days.
  If you choose a split, still hit each muscle 2×/week and keep weekly sets similar to your full-body plan (Schoenfeld et al., 2019; Hamarsland et al., 2022).
  
  

Conclusion

For most busy adults, full-body 2–3×/week is the sweet spot: equal or better results than body-part splits with less soreness and better adherence. Keep showing up, stack small wins, and let volume and frequency drive progress.

Need help getting started? Click here to book a free strategy session with a coach.

We design customized training and nutrition plans specifically for busy adults over 30. No fluff. Just structure, accountability, and results.

References (APA)

Baz-Valle, E., et al. (2022). A systematic review of the effects of different resistance training volumes on muscle hypertrophy. Biology, 11(3), 393. 

Carneiro, M. A. S., et al. (2024). Full-body resistance training promotes greater fat mass reduction than split routine in trained males. Physiological Reports, 12(2), e16141.

Evangelista, A. L., et al. (2021). Split or full-body workout routine: Which is best to increase muscle strength and hypertrophy? Sports (Basel), 9(9), 117.

Hamarsland, H., et al. (2022). Equal-volume strength training with different training frequencies induces similar muscle hypertrophy and strength improvement in trained participants. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 17(4), 616–623.

Schoenfeld, B. J., et al. (2019). How many times per week should a muscle be trained to maximize hypertrophy? Journal of Sports Sciences, 37(11), 1286–1295.

Wilke, J., & Behringer, M. (2021). Is “delayed onset muscle soreness” a false friend? Frontiers in Physiology, 12, 620587.